ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Cardiac events among patients with sarcoma treated with doxorubicin by method of infusion: A real-world database study.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiparametric Bioresorbable Sensor for Doxorubicin Detection via Molecularly Imprinted Synthetic Receptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Sarcoma: Cardiovascular and Oncologic Considerations: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Review
- In vivo and in situ monitoring of doxorubicin pharmacokinetics with an implantable bioresorbable optical sensor.Science advances · 2025Article
- Cardiac events among patients with sarcoma treated with doxorubicin by method of infusion: A real-world database study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The Rate of Infusion Represents an Important Aspect of Administering Anticancer Agents.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdministration of doxorubicin by continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion, versus bolus (BOL) administration, has been proposed to mitigate the risk of cardiac events. This study used real-world data to explore the association between mode of doxorubicin administration and duration of treatment, time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and cardiac events.
methodsOccurrence of cardiac events after initiation of BOL versus CIV doxorubicin for sarcoma in the International Business Machines MarketScan claims database were compared. Duration of doxorubicin treatment, TTF, and time-to-first-cardiac event (TCE) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models.
resultsA total of 196 patients were included in the BOL group and 399 in the CIV group. In unadjusted analyses, there were significant differences between BOL versus CIV for duration of doxorubicin treatment (median 1.4 vs. 2.1 months, p = .002), TTF (median 8.8 vs. 5.6 months, p = .002), and TCE (medians not reached, p = .03). Adjusting for baseline covariates, only TTF remained significant (hazard ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.86, p = .0004), favoring BOL.
conclusionsWhile the risk of cardiac complications was higher with BOL in unadjusted analysis, the risk was no longer present in the adjusted analysis. While we cannot draw causal inferences due to the retrospective, nonrandomized study design, these data suggest that replacing BOL with prolonged CIV administration has not been effective as a strategy to mitigate cardiac events, given community standards of oncologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.