Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852010›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Field evidence for litter and self-DNA inhibitory effects on Alnus glutinosa roots.

Giuliano Bonanomi, Maurizio Zotti, Mohamed Idbella, Pasquale Termolino, Veronica De Micco, Stefano Mazzoleni

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Self-DNA inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Metabolic Responses of the MicroalgaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-DNA Early Exposure in Cultivated and WeedyPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuliano BonanomiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.
Maurizio ZottiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5540-9477
Mohamed IdbellaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6303-3737
Pasquale TermolinoCNR-IBBR institute of Bioscience and BioResources, Via Università 133, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.
Veronica De MiccoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.
Stefano MazzoleniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Università 100, 80055, Portici (Naples), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-2625
University of Naples Federico II · ITInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Litter decomposition releases nutrients beneficial to plants but also induces phytotoxicity. Phytotoxicity can result from either labile allelopathic compounds or species specific and caused by conspecific DNA. Aquatic plants in flowing water generally do not suffer phytotoxicity because litter is regularly removed. In stagnant water or in litter packs an impact on root functionality can occur. So far, studies on water plant roots have been carried out in laboratory and never in field conditions. The effect of conspecific vs heterospecific litter and purified DNA were assessed on aquatic roots of the riparian woody species Alnus glutinosa L. using a novel method, using closed and open plastic tubes fixed to single roots in the field with closed tubes analogous to stagnant water. Four fresh and four decomposed litter types were used and analysed on extractable C, cellulose, lignin, N content and using

Indexed as

AlnusEcosystemLigninPlant LeavesPlantsPlasticsSoilWaterLigninPlasticsSoilWater13C-CPMAS NMRaquatic rootC : N ratiodecompositionepifluorescence microscopyplant-soil feedbackroot anatomy

Identifiers

PMID35852010
OpenAlexW4285801247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.