Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851968›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2022

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?

Frederik Boetius Hertz, Karen Leth Nielsen, Markus Harboe Olsen, Søren Røddik Ebdrup, Christina Nielsen, Nikolai Soren Kirkby, Niels Frimodt-Møller, Kirsten Møller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Emergence of linezolid-resistantMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederik Boetius HertzDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen Leth NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus Harboe OlsenDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren Røddik EbdrupDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolai Soren KirkbyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels Frimodt-MøllerDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten MøllerDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

MICA-foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes the collection of rectal swabs specifically for VRE screening. Our purpose was to describe the carrier prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci among acute patients admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (NICU). Between April 2018 and January 2019, we investigated 99 consecutive rectal swabs from patients admitted to NICU. The primary outcome was prevalence of VRE carriage. The median age was 64 years (range 23-87) and gender was equally distributed (Female = 47, Male = 46). 26 (28%) had previously been admitted within 179 days and 67 patients (72%) had no hospital admissions within 180 days prior to the admission to NICU. Of the 93 rectal swabs, 2 (2%, 95% CI 0.26-7.55%) were positive for vanA and none were positive for vanB. Routine screening of all patients at admission may be effective in hospital settings with high VRE prevalence, whereas the benefit of screening for VRE in hospitals with a low prevalence may be restricted to specific patient populations.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinactive screeningbacteriologyclinical microbiologymultidrug resistanceVRE

Identifiers

PMID35851968
PMCPMC9805049
OpenAlexW4285799693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.