Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851929›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2022

Giant prolactinoma in children and adolescents: a single-center experience and systematic review.

Sandeep Kumar, Vijaya Sarathi, Anurag Ranjan Lila, Manjeetkaur Sehemby, Saba Samad Memon, Manjiri Karlekar, Shilpa Sankhe, Virendra A Patil, Nalini Shah, Tushar Bandgar

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas-A Swedish Nationwide Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandeep KumarDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Vijaya SarathiDepartment of Endocrinology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, India.
Anurag Ranjan LilaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India. anuraglila@gmail.com.
Manjeetkaur SehembyDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Saba Samad MemonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Manjiri KarlekarDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Shilpa SankheDepartment of Radiology, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Virendra A PatilDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Nalini ShahDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Tushar BandgarDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India.
College of Medicine & JNM Hospital · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiant prolactinoma (GP) in childhood and adolescence is a rare entity with scarce literature. We aimed to describe clinical features, biochemistry, radiology, genetics, management, and outcome in pediatric (≤ 20 years) GP.

methodsRetrospective record review of 18 pediatric GP patients from our center and systematic review including these and 77 from the literature (total cohort: 95).

resultsGP constituted 20% of our pediatric prolactinoma cohort. In the total cohort (age: 15.4 ± 3.5 years), the majority (77, 82.8%) were males. Mass effect symptoms (88.6%), and pubertal delay/arrest in males (82.1%) were frequent. Median basal prolactin was 8649 (3246-17,532) ng/ml and the maximum tumor dimension was 5.5 ± 1.5 cm. MEN1 and AIP mutations were noted in 7 (21.9%) and 6 (18.8%) patients, respectively. Males with central hypogonadism had baseline bi-testicular volume of 20.2 ± 8.4 cc, lower LH than FSH (-2.04 ± 0.9 vs. -0.7 ± 1.6 SDS, p = 0.0075), and mostly, normal inhibin B. Majority (49/76, 64.5%) received dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment with additional therapy in 35% (17/49). DA monotherapy arm had less frequent central hypothyroidism (42.9% vs 87.1%, p = 0.002) and central adrenal insufficiency (7.1% vs 66.7%, p = 0.0003) than multimodal therapy. A smaller tumor dimension (4.7 vs. 5.7 cm, p = 0.04) was associated with normoprolactinemia on DA monotherapy and AIP mutations (33.3% vs. nil, p = 0.02) with multimodal therapy.

conclusionGP is characterized by male predominance with frequent delay/arrest of puberty (82%), but relative sparing of the FSH-inhibin B axis in boys. DA monotherapy may be preferred as the first-line therapy in pediatric GP.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaAdolescentChildDopamine AgonistsFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansMaleProlactinRetrospective StudiesDopamine AgonistsFollicle Stimulating HormoneProlactinChildhood prolactinomaGiant prolactinomaPediatric prolactinomaPituitary adenomaProlactinomaYoung prolactinoma

Identifiers

PMID35851929
OpenAlexW4285729127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.