ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022
Intraoperative cone-beam CT with metal artifact reduction for assessment of the electrode position and the intracranial structures during deep brain stimulation procedure.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD), the clinical outcome largely depends on the appropriate position of the electrode implanted in the targeted structure. In intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) performed for the evaluation of the electrode position, the metal artifact induced by the implanted electrode can prevent the precise localization of the electrode. Metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques have been recently developed that can dramatically improve the visualization of objects by reducing metal artifacts after performing cone-beam CT. Hence, in this case series, we attempted to clarify the usefulness and accuracy of intraoperative cone-beam CT with MAR (intraCBCTwM) by comparing with both intraoperative cone-beam CT without MAR (intraCBCTwoM) and conventional postoperative CT (post-CT) for the assessment of the implanted electrode position and the intracranial structures during DBS procedures.
methodsBetween November 2019 and December 2020, 10 patients with PD who underwent DBS at our institution were recruited, and the images of 9 patients (bilateral: n = 8, unilateral: n = 1) were analyzed. The artifact index (AI) in intraCBCTwM or intraCBCTwoM, and conventional post-CT were retrospectively assessed using the standard deviation of the region-of-interest around the implanted electrodes and background noise. Additionally, the Euclidean distances gap of electrode tip based on post-CT in each fusion image was compared between intraCBCTwM and intraCBCTwoM.
resultsThe AI was significantly lower in intraCBCTwM than in intraCBCTwoM (P < 0.01). The mean Euclidean distance between the tip of the electrode in intraCBCTwM and in post-CT was significantly shorter compared to that in intraCBCTwoM (P < 0.05).
conclusionsThe results reported here suggest that intraCBCTwM is a more useful and accurate method than intraCBCTwoM to assess the implanted electrode position and intracranial structures during DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.