Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851806›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Isis B T Joosten, Cheyenne E W Janssen, Corinne G C Horlings, Dennis den Uijl, Reinder Evertz, Baziel G M van Engelen, Catharina G Faber, Kevin Vernooy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cardiac pacing and lead devices management: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isis B T JoostenDepartment of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1110-6172
Cheyenne E W JanssenDepartment of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Corinne G C HorlingsDepartment of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dennis den UijlDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4158-0545
Reinder EvertzDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Baziel G M van EngelenDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Catharina G FaberDepartment of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-5964
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds W.OR15-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). METHODS AND

resultsA retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing routine cardiac screening with at least one 24 h Holter monitoring between January 2010 and December 2020. For each individual, the following data were collected: Holter results, results of electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at the same year as Holter monitoring, presence of cardiac complaints, and neuromuscular status. Holter findings were compared with the results of cardiac screening (ECG + history taking) performed at the same year. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or arrhythmias that would have remained undiagnosed based on history taking and ECG alone were considered de novo findings. A total 235 genetically confirmed DM1 patients were included. Abnormal Holter results were discovered in 126 (54%) patients after a mean follow-up of 64 ± 28 months in which an average of 3 ± 1 Holter recordings per patient was performed. Abnormalities upon Holter mainly consisted of conduction disorders (70%) such as atrioventricular (AV) block. Out of 126 patients with abnormal Holter findings, 74 (59%) patients had de novo Holter findings including second-degree AV block, atrial fibrillation/flutter and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patient characteristics were unable to predict the occurrence of de novo Holter findings. In 39 out of 133 (29%) patients with normal ECGs upon yearly cardiac screening, abnormalities were found on Holter monitoring during follow-up.

conclusionTwenty-four hour Holter monitoring is of added value to routine cardiac screening for all DM1 patients.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrioventricular BlockMyotonic DystrophyElectrocardiographyElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryHumansRetrospective StudiesAmbulatory monitoringElectrocardiogramHolter monitoringMyotonic dystrophyNeuromuscular disease

Identifiers

PMID35851806
PMCPMC9907751
OpenAlexW4285796934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.