Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851801›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2022

Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision-making?

Carly N Bisset, Eamonn Ferguson, Ewan MacDermid, Sharon L Stein, Nuha Yassin, Nicola Dames, Deborah S Keller, Raymond Oliphant, Simon H Parson, Jennifer Cleland and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Decision making and outcomes in colorectal cancer and frailty: the DeCaF study.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Carly N BissetDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
Eamonn FergusonDepartment of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7678-1451
Ewan MacDermidFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sharon L SteinUHRISES: Research in Surgical Outcomes and Effectiveness, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nuha YassinDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Nicola DamesAssociation of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland Patient Liaison Group, UK.
Deborah S KellerDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Raymond OliphantDepartment of Medical Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Simon H ParsonDepartment of Medical Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jennifer ClelandMedical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Susan J MougDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBNanyang Technological University · SGRoyal Alexandra Hospital · GBThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Bowel Research UKIleostomy and Internal Pouch Association
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecision-making under uncertainty may be influenced by an individual's personality. The primary aim was to explore associations between surgeon personality traits and colorectal anastomotic decision-making.

methodsColorectal surgeons worldwide participated in a two-part online survey. Part 1 evaluated surgeon characteristics using the Big Five Inventory to measure personality (five domains: agreeableness; conscientiousness; extraversion; emotional stability; openness) in response to scenarios presented in Part 2 involving anastomotic decisions (i.e. rejoining the bowel with/without temporary stomas, or permanent diversion with end colostomy). Anastomotic decisions were compared using repeated-measure ANOVA. Mean scores of traits domains were compared with normative data using two-tailed t tests.

resultsIn total, 186 surgeons participated, with 127 surgeons completing both parts of the survey (68.3 per cent). One hundred and thirty-one surgeons were male (70.4 per cent) and 144 were based in Europe (77.4 per cent). Forty-one per cent (77 surgeons) had begun independent practice within the last 5 years. Surgeon personality differed from the general population, with statistically significantly higher levels of emotional stability (3.25 versus 2.97 respectively), lower levels of agreeableness (3.03 versus 3.74), extraversion (2.81 versus 3.38) and openness (3.19 versus 3.67), and similar levels of conscientiousness (3.42 versus 3.40 (all P <0.001)). Female surgeons had significantly lower levels of openness (P <0.001) than males (3.06 versus 3.25). Personality was associated with anastomotic decision-making in specific scenarios.

conclusionColorectal surgeons have different personality traits from the general population. Certain traits seem to be associated with anastomotic decision-making but only in specific scenarios. Further exploration of the association of personality, risk-taking, and decision-making in surgery is necessary.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSurgeonsAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMalePersonalitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35851801
PMCPMC10364753
OpenAlexW4286222110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.