Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851757›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2022

Approaches to accelerating the study of new antiretrovirals in pregnancy.

Elaine J Abrams, Alexandra Calmy, Lee Fairlie, Imelda C Mahaka, Lameck Chimula, Patricia M Flynn, John Kinuthia, Landon Myer, Saye H Khoo, Philippa Musoke and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Elaine J AbramsICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Alexandra CalmyHIV/AIDS Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-6826
Lee FairlieWits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-1734
Imelda C MahakaPangaea Zimbabwe AIDS Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-9865-8756
Lameck ChimulaUniversity of North Carolina Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Patricia M FlynnSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Saye H KhooDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-0967
Philippa MusokeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sheryl ZwerskiDivision of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer M ZechICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-0784
Shahin LockmanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-9716
George K SiberryOffice of HIV/AIDS, Bureau of Global Health, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-1596
ICAP Global HealthBrigham and Women's Hospital · USFamily Aids Caring Trust · ZWMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUnited States Agency for International Development · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) GroupU01AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI JACKSON, J BROOKS · 2006 to 2010
$109.7M
Wits HIV Research Group CLINICAL TRIAL UNIT (CTU) reapplicationUM1AI069463 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI REES, HELEN, SANNE, IAN MATTHIAS · 2012 to 2025
$31.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen who are pregnant or who could become pregnant experience delayed access to or underinformed use of important new antiretroviral (ARV) drugs because of traditional drug development processes that ostensibly aim to reduce potential harm but effectively fail to ensure that timely information about safe and effective use in pregnancy is available. DISCUSSION: The World Health Organization and International Maternal, Pediatric, Adolescent Antiretroviral Clinical Trials Network convened a year-long workshop on "Approaches to Enhance and Accelerate Study of New Drugs for HIV and Associated Infections in Pregnant Women." Workshop participants were tasked with defining key principles and optimal approaches to including pregnant women in pre- and post-licensure trials in order to accelerate the availability of pharmacokinetic and safety data for new ARV agents in pregnancy. ARV efficacy in pregnancy and ARV efficacy for prevention of vertical transmission can be extrapolated from proof of efficacy in non-pregnant adults, provided that drug levels in pregnancy are similar. However, short-term safety and pharmacokinetics must be studied directly in pregnant women and should be conducted and included in initial licensure for all new ARVs. Accelerating the timeline for completion of pre-clinical studies is essential for pregnancy short-term safety and pharmacokinetic studies to be safely completed by the time a drug is licensed. Composite key pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes are critical for drugs expected to have broad use, and studies should be initiated at or soon after drug licensure. Teratogenicity risk cannot be feasibly assessed before drug licensure and will depend on robust post-marketing surveillance systems. With some modifications, these principles will apply to ARVs used for prevention, two-drug regimens, long-acting ARVs and ARVs administered through novel delivery systems.

conclusionsImplementation of the proposed principles and framework will enhance and accelerate the study of new ARVs in pregnancy, resulting in more timely, equitable and informed access to new ARVs for pregnant women.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyWorld Health OrganizationAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsantiretroviralsARVclinical trialspregnancypregnancy outcomesregistrational trials

Identifiers

PMID35851757
PMCPMC9294864
OpenAlexW4285806136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.