Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851750›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Understanding the effects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings on maternal and child nutrition in rural Odisha, India: A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Audrey Prost, Helen Harris-Fry, Satyanarayan Mohanty, Manoj Parida, Sneha Krishnan, Emily Fivian, Suchitra Rath, Nirmala Nair, Naba K Mishra, Shibanath Padhan and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6121-8132
Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Satyanarayan MohantyD-COR Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneshwar, India.
Manoj ParidaD-COR Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneshwar, India.
Sneha KrishnanJindal School of Environment and Sustainability, Jindal Global University, Haryana, India.
Emily FivianDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Suchitra RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Nirmala NairEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Naba K MishraVoluntary Association for Rural Reconstruction and Appropriate Technology (VARRAT), Kendrapara, India.
Shibanath PadhanVoluntary Association for Rural Reconstruction and Appropriate Technology (VARRAT), Kendrapara, India.
Ronali PradhanDigital Green, New Delhi, India.
Satyapriya SahuDigital Green, New Delhi, India.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Heather DantonJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Peggy Koniz-BooherJSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-1572
Emma BeaumontDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Philip JamesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5448-8193
Elizabeth AllenDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Diana ElbourneDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Suneetha KadiyalaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-1471
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBH Consulting (Ireland) · IEEkjut · INGreen Technology · USProfessional Education and Research Institute · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · INUniversity College London · GBO. P. Jindal Global University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A trial of three nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings in rural Odisha, India, found improvements in maternal and child dietary diversity, limited effects on agricultural production, and no effects on women and children's nutritional status. Our process evaluation explored fidelity, reach, and mechanisms behind interventions' effects. We also examined how context affected implementation, mechanisms, and outcomes. We used data from intervention monitoring systems, review notes, trial surveys, 32 case studies with families (n = 91 family members), and 20 group discussions with women's group members and intervention workers (n = 181 and 32, respectively). We found that interventions were implemented with high fidelity. Groups reached around half of the mothers of children under 2 years. Videos and meetings increased women's knowledge, motivation and confidence to suggest or make changes to their diets and agricultural production. Families responded in diverse ways. Many adopted or improved rainfed homestead garden cultivation for consumption, which could explain gains in maternal and child dietary diversity seen in the impact evaluation. Cultivation for income was less common. This was often due to small landholdings, poor access to irrigation and decision-making dominated by men. Interventions helped change norms about heavy work during pregnancy, but young women with little family support still did considerable work. Women's ability to shape cultivation, income and workload decisions was strongly influenced by support from male relatives. Future nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions could include additional flexibility to address families' land, water, labour and time constraints, as well as actively engage with spouses and in-laws.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusWomenAgricultureChildFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansInfantMaleMothersPregnancyWaterWaterchild nutritioncluster randomised controlled trialdietmaternal nutritionqualitative methodssocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID35851750
PMCPMC9480959
OpenAlexW4285797595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.