Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851428›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2022

Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation.

Victor J M Zeijen, Lida Feyz, Rajiv Nannan Panday, Kevin Veen, Jorie Versmissen, Isabella Kardys, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Kidney Denervation: Latest Breakthroughs and Insights.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Hypertension.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment a clinical consensus statement from the Thai hypertension society.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor J M ZeijenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0029-4064
Lida FeyzDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-5518
Rajiv Nannan PandayDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin VeenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-8384
Jorie VersmissenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-7765
Isabella KardysDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2115-9745
Nicolas M Van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-1205
Joost DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Rg-628, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1410
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRenal denervation (RDN) proved to significantly lower blood pressure (BP) at 2-6 months in patients on and off antihypertensive drugs. Given a lack of longer-term follow-up data, our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of RDN up to five years taking into account antihypertensive drug regimen changes over time.

methodsIn the present single-center study, patients underwent RDN for (therapy resistant) hypertension. Patients underwent protocolized yearly follow-up out to five years. Data were collected on 24-h ambulatory BP and office BP monitoring, renal function, antihypertensive drug regimen, and safety events, including non-invasive renal artery imaging at 6/12 months. Efficacy analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models.

resultsSeventy-two patients with mean age 63.3 ± 9.5 (SD) years (51% female) were included. Median follow-up time was 3.5 years and Clark's Completeness Index was 72%. Baseline ambulatory daytime BP was 146.1/83.7 ± 17.4/12.2 mmHg under a mean number of 4.9 ± 2.7 defined daily doses (DDD). At five years, ambulatory daytime systolic BP as calculated from the mixed model was 120.8 (95% CI 114.2-127.5) mmHg and diastolic BP was 73.3 (95% CI 69.4-77.3) mmHg, implying a reduction of -20.9/-8.3 mmHg as compared to baseline estimates (p < 0.0001). The number of DDDs remained stable over time (p = 0.87). No procedure-related major adverse events resulting in long-term consequences were observed.

conclusionsThe BP-lowering effect of RDN was safely maintained at least five years post-procedure as reflected by a significant decrease in ambulatory daytime BP in the absence of escalating antihypertensive drug therapy over time.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionAgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDenervationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedSympathectomyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensive agentsBlood pressure monitoring, ambulatoryHypertensionKidneyRenal arterySympathectomy

Identifiers

PMID35851428
PMCPMC9622524
OpenAlexW4285731416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.