Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851407›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Gaps and alternative surgical and non-surgical approaches in the bone fragility management: an updated review.

Umberto Tarantino, Ida Cariati, Chiara Greggi, Riccardo Iundusi, Elena Gasbarra, Giovanni Iolascon, Andreas Kurth, Kristina E Akesson, Mary Bouxsein, Paolo Tranquilli Leali and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 versus reference denosumab: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anti-sclerostin antibodies: a new frontier in fragility fractures treatment.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Umberto TarantinoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Ida CariatiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Chiara GreggiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo IundusiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, "Policlinico Tor Vergata" Foundation, Viale Oxford 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Elena GasbarraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, "Policlinico Tor Vergata" Foundation, Viale Oxford 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni IolasconDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Andreas KurthDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Community Clinics Middle Rhine, Campus Kemperhof, Koblenz, Germany.
Kristina E AkessonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Mary BouxseinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Harvard Medical School, BIDMC, Boston, MA, USA.
Paolo Tranquilli LealiOrthopaedic Department, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Roberto CivininiDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco FalezOrthopaedic and Traumatology Department, S. Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maria Luisa BrandiFIRMO Foundation, 50141, Florence, Italy. marialuisa.brandi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-0592
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USFondazione FADOI · ITLund University · SEOspedale di Santo Spirito · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are one of the major problems facing healthcare systems worldwide. Undoubtedly, fragility fractures of the hip represent a far greater burden in terms of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs than other fracture sites. However, despite the significant impact on the health and quality of life of older adults, there is a general lack of awareness of osteoporosis, which results in suboptimal care. In fact, most high-risk individuals are never identified and do not receive adequate treatment, leading to further fragility fractures and worsening health status. Furthermore, considering the substantial treatment gap and the proven cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention programs such as Fracture Liaison Services, urgent action is needed to ensure that all individuals at high risk of fragility fracture are adequately assessed and treated. Based on this evidence, the aim of our review was to (i) provide an overview and comparison of the burden and management of fragility fractures, highlighting the main gaps, and (ii) highlight the importance of using alternative approaches, both surgical and non-surgical, with the aim of implementing early prevention of osteoporotic fractures and improving the management of osteoporotic patients at imminent and/or very high risk of fracture.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansQuality of LifeSecondary PreventionBone Density Conservation AgentsFractureFracture riskFragilityGaps, OsteoporosisOsteoporosis management

Identifiers

PMID35851407
OpenAlexW4285800841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.