Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

HARLEY mitigates user bias and facilitates efficient quantification and co-localization analyses of foci in yeast fluorescence images.

Ilya Shabanov, J Ross Buchan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ilya ShabanovDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. ilyashabanov35@gmail.com.
J Ross BuchanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. rbuchan@arizona.edu.

Funding

Stress Granule clearance via Autophagy: Mechanism, Regulation and ConsequencesR01GM114564 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BUCHAN, JOHN ROSS · 2016 to 2025
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114564NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM114564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of cellular structures in fluorescence microscopy data is a key means of understanding cellular function. Unfortunately, numerous cellular structures present unique challenges in their ability to be unbiasedly and accurately detected and quantified. In our studies on stress granules in yeast, users displayed a striking variation of up to 3.7-fold in foci calls and were only able to replicate their results with 62-78% accuracy, when re-quantifying the same images. To facilitate consistent results we developed HARLEY (Human Augmented Recognition of LLPS Ensembles in Yeast), a customizable software for detection and quantification of stress granules in S. cerevisiae. After a brief model training on ~ 20 cells the detection and quantification of foci is fully automated and based on closed loops in intensity contours, constrained only by the a priori known size of the features of interest. Since no shape is implied, this method is not limited to round features, as is often the case with other algorithms. Candidate features are annotated with a set of geometrical and intensity-based properties to train a kernel Support Vector Machine to recognize features of interest. The trained classifier is then used to create consistent results across datasets. For less ambiguous foci datasets, a parametric selection is available. HARLEY is an intuitive tool aimed at yeast microscopy users without much technical expertise. It allows batch processing of foci detection and quantification, and the ability to run various geometry-based and pixel-based colocalization analyses to uncover trends or correlations in foci-related data. HARLEY is open source and can be downloaded from https://github.com/lnilya/harley .

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAlgorithmsHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35851403
PMCPMC9293886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.