Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851392›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Combined endoscopic-percutaneous treatment of upper gastrointestinal enterocutaneous fistula using vacuum therapy and resorbable plug insertion (Vac-Plug).

Marcus Kantowski, Karl Karstens, Pasquale Scognamiglio, Nathaniel Melling, Matthias Reeh, Jakob Izbicki, Thomas Rösch, Michael Tachezy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus KantowskiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Karl KarstensDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Pasquale ScognamiglioDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Nathaniel MellingDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias ReehDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jakob IzbickiDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas RöschDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael TachezyDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Str. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. mtachezy@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After gastrointestinal resections, leakages can occur, persist despite conventional therapy and result in enterocutaneous fistulae. We developed a combination method using flexible endoscopic techniques to seal the enteric orifice with an absorbable plug in addition to a percutaneously and fistuloscopically guided open-pore film drainage (Vac-Plug method). We retrospectively searched our endoscopy database to identify patients treated with the outlined technique. The clinical and pathological data were assessed, the method analyzed and characterized and the technical and clinical success determined. We identified 14 patients that were treated with the Vac-Plug method (4 females, 10 males with a mean age of 56 years, range 50-74). The patients were treated over a time period of 23 days (range 4-119) in between one to thirteen interventions (mean n = 5). One patient had to be excluded due to short follow-up after successful closure. Seventy-seven percent (10/13) were successfully treated with a median follow-up of 453 days (range 35-1246) thereafter. No treatment related complications occurred during the therapy. The data of the analysis showed that the Vac-Plug therapy is safe and successful in a relevant proportion of the patients. It is easy to learn and to apply and is well tolerated. In our opinion, it is a promising addition to the armamentarium of interventional methods of these difficult to treat patients. Of course, its usefulness must be further validated in larger prospective studies.

Indexed as

Intestinal FistulaNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyAgedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35851392
PMCPMC9293963
OpenAlexW4285803032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.