Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851154›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2022

Reproducible measurable residual disease detection by multiparametric flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia.

Maximilian A Röhnert, Michael Kramer, Jonas Schadt, Philipp Ensel, Christian Thiede, Stefan W Krause, Veit Bücklein, Jörg Hoffmann, Sonia Jaramillo, Richard F Schlenk and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  15. Novel Tools for Diagnosis and Monitoring of AML.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maximilian A RöhnertDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Maximilian-Alexander.Roehnert@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8213-2047
Michael KramerDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jonas SchadtDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-9178
Philipp EnselDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian ThiedeDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-2048
Stefan W KrauseDepartment of Medicine 5, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-4651
Veit BückleinDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-7280
Jörg HoffmannDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sonia JaramilloDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Richard F SchlenkDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph RölligDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-0548
Martin BornhäuserDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5916-3029
Nicholas McCarthyInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sylvie FreemanInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-180X
Uta Oelschlägel *Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Malte von Bonin *Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-0031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with AML. A simple, broadly applicable eight-color panel was implemented and analyzed utilizing a hierarchical gating strategy with fixed gates to develop a clear-cut LAIP-based DfN approach. In total, 32 subpopulations with aberrant phenotypes with/without expression of markers of immaturity were monitored in 246 AML patients after completion of induction chemotherapy. Reference values were established utilizing 90 leukemia-free controls. Overall, 73% of patients achieved a response by cytomorphology. In responders, the overall survival was shorter for MRD

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35851154
PMCPMC9417981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.