Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35851006›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Differential impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol consumption between Scottish men and women: controlled interrupted time series analysis.

Jürgen Rehm, Amy O'Donnell, Eileen F S Kaner, Eva Jane LLopis, Jakob Manthey, Peter Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Jürgen RehmSocial and Epidemiological Research, CAMH, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy O'DonnellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4071-9434
Eileen F S KanerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eva Jane LLopisDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Jakob MantheyInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-3760
Peter AndersonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK peteranderson.mail@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4605-9828
Newcastle University · GBCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMaastricht University · NLTechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the immediate impact of the introduction of minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland on alcohol consumption and whether the impact differed by sex, level of alcohol consumption, age, social grade and level of residential deprivation of respondents.

designPrimary controlled interrupted time series analysis and secondary before-and-after analysis of the impact of introducing MUP in Scotland using alcohol consumption data for England as control.

settingData from Kantar Worldpanel's Alcovision survey, a continuous retrospective online timeline follow-back diary survey of the previous week's alcohol consumption.

participants53 347 women and 53 143 men.

interventionsIntroduction of a minimum price of 50 pence per UK unit (6.25 pence/g) for the sale of alcohol in Scotland on 1 May 2018.

main outcome measuresNumber of grams of alcohol consumed per week, in total, in off-trade (eg, at home) and in on-trade (eg, in pubs, restaurants).

resultsPrimary interrupted time series analyses found that the introduction of MUP was associated with a drop in reported weekly total alcohol consumption of 5.94 g (95% CI 1.29 to 10.60), a drop in off-trade consumption of 3.27 g (95% CI -0.01 to 6.56) and a drop in on-trade consumption of 2.67 g (95% CI -1.48 to 6.82). Associated reductions were larger for women than for men and were greater among heavier drinkers than for lighter drinkers, except for the 5% of heaviest drinking men for whom an associated increase in consumption was found. Secondary before-and-after analyses found that reductions in consumption were greater among older respondents and those living in less deprived areas. The introduction of MUP was not associated with a reduction in consumption among younger men and men living in more deprived areas.

conclusionsGreater policy attention needs to be addressed to the heaviest drinking men, to younger men and to men who live in more deprived areas.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesWhite PeopleAlcohol DrinkingCommerceCosts and Cost AnalysisEthanolFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleRetrospective StudiesScotlandEthanolPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINESubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID35851006
PMCPMC9315916
OpenAlexW4285806410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.