Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35850984›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2022

The Optimal Cut-off of the Latex Immunoassay (LZ Test) for Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on the Stool Antigen Test and Helicobacter pylori-associated Gastritis.

Takako Takayama, Hideo Suzuki, Kosuke Okada, Shintaro Akiyama, Toshiaki Narasaka, Kazushi Maruo, Taku Sakamoto, Emiko Seo, Kiichiro Tsuchiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takako TakayamaTsukuba Preventive Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan.
Hideo SuzukiTsukuba Preventive Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan.
Kosuke OkadaTsukuba Preventive Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan.
Shintaro AkiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Toshiaki NarasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazushi MaruoDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Taku SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Emiko SeoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Kiichiro TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Helicobacter pylori antibody kits using the latex immunoassay (LIA) are widely used in Japan. However, the optimal cut-off of the LIA remains unclear. This study clarified the optimal cut-off of the LIA for assessing the current infection status of patients (currently infected, never infected, spontaneously eradicated) in clinical practice. Methods In total, 482 subjects with no history of H. pylori eradication therapy who underwent a medical examination at our hospital were enrolled. The infection status was ascertained using a stool antigen test, and the endoscopic findings of H. pylori-associated gastritis. H. pylori antibody levels were measured using the LIA. Results In total, 414, 38, and 30 subjects were categorized into the never-infected, currently infected, and spontaneously eradicated groups. The optimal cut-off based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 4 U/mL, whereas the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for differentiating never-infected and currently infected subjects were 0.95, 92.1%, and 94.7%, respectively. When applying the cut-off of 4 U/mL to the judgment of current infection in all subjects, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.1% and 92.6%, respectively. Conclusion Our findings suggest that 4 U/mL was the optimal cut-off for differentiating current infection from no prior infection, and the value may be stable because of the exclusion of subjects with spontaneous eradication. The cut-off may be useful in initial screening for current H. pylori infection.

Indexed as

GastritisHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriIntraabdominal InfectionsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialFecesHumansImmunoassayLatexSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialLatexHelicobacter pylorilatex immunoassayoptimal cut-off

Identifiers

PMID35850984
PMCPMC9381343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.