Article in Seminars in perinatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Sara B DeMauroUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2716 South Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19146, United States. Electronic address: DeMauro@chop.edu.
Stephanie L MerharUniversity of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Myriam Peralta-CarcelenUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Betty R VohrWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.
Andrea F DuncanUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Susan R HintzStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Funding
Neonatal Research Network Data Coordinating Center (DCC) 2023-2028U24HD095254 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Abhik Das · 2018 to 2026
$70.2M
Neonatal Research Network Data Coordinating Center (DCC)U10HD036790 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI DAS, ABHIK · 2008 to 2017
$62.3M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD021385 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHANKARAN, SEETHA · 1991 to 2015
$8.7M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027904 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI LAPTOOK, ABBOT R · 1991 to 2015
$8.7M
MULTICENTER NETWORK OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITSU10HD021397 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DUARA, SHAHNAZ · 1991 to 2006
$6.7M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD034216 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CARLO FONT, WALDEMAR A. · 1996 to 2015
$6.4M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027853 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SCHIBLER, KURT R · 1991 to 2015
$6.2M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027880 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI VAN MEURS, KRISA PAGE · 1991 to 2015
$6.1M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD021373 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI KENNEDY, KATHLEEN A · 1991 to 2015
$6.1M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD021364 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI WALSH, MICHELE · 1991 to 2015
$6.1M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027856 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SOKOL, GREGORY M. · 1991 to 2015
$5.9M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD040689 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WYCKOFF, MYRA HELEN · 2001 to 2015
Follow-up studies are essential for understanding outcomes and informing the care of infants with high risk for medical and developmental consequences because of extreme prematurity or perinatal illness. Studies that extend to school age often identify sequelae that go unrecognized in neonatal or short-term follow-up studies. Many critical neurocognitive, behavioral, functional, and health outcomes are best assessed beginning at school age. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) has performed comprehensive school age evaluations of several key trial cohorts. This manuscript summarizes the important contributions of school age follow-up studies in the NRN, both historically and in ongoing research. We describe in detail the clinical questions that have been answered by the completed studies and new questions about the outcomes of high-risk infants that must be addressed by ongoing and future studies.
Indexed as
Infant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, Premature, DiseasesChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)PregnancyUnited States
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The critical importance of follow-up to school age: Contributions of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. · full record | OpenQuestion