Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35850700›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

Improving the intensive care experience from the perspectives of different stakeholders.

Jos M Latour, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Theresa Jacques, Marc Wysocki, Elie Azoulay, Victoria Metaxa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: 'Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged … '.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jos M LatourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. jos.latour@plymouth.ac.uk.
Nancy Kentish-BarnesFamirea Study Group, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hȏpitaux de Paris, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Theresa JacquesDepartment of Intensive Care, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Marc WysockiLife Care and Digital Solutions, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, USA.
Elie AzoulayFamirea Study Group, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hȏpitaux de Paris, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Victoria MetaxaDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex environment where patients, family members and healthcare professionals have their own personal experiences. Improving ICU experiences necessitates the involvement of all stakeholders. This holistic approach will invariably improve the care of ICU survivors, increase family satisfaction and staff wellbeing, and contribute to dignified end-of-life care. Inclusive and transparent participation of the industry can be a significant addition to develop tools and strategies for delivering this holistic care. We present a report, which follows a round table on ICU experience at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The aim is to discuss the current evidence on patient, family and healthcare professional experience in ICU is provided, together with the panel's suggestions on potential improvements. Combined with industry, the perspectives of all stakeholders suggest that ongoing improvement of ICU experience is warranted.

Indexed as

Critical CareTerminal CareFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsSurvivorsComfortExperiencesFamilyHealthcare professionalsIndustryIntensive care unitPatientsPerceptionsQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID35850700
PMCPMC9289931
OpenAlexW4285730735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.