SynthesisBMC health services research2022
An integrative perspective on interorganizational multilevel healthcare networks: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical-Bioethical Mediation as a Potential Governance Innovation for Sustainable, Efficient, and Resilient Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coordinating care across hospitals: how integration shapes patient mobility.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Practices and outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration to support the integration of healthcare into the daily lives of technology-dependent children.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding the initiation, formation, functioning, and performing of networks to change practices - Realist evaluation of a programme to improve newborn care in Kenya.SSM - health systems · 2025Article
- A dynamic model to sustain the spark: How do network coordinators in Dutch healthcare networks maintain network commitment?PloS one · 2025Article
- Addressing integration in the organization of palliative care in belgium: a multilevel ecosystems approach using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Assembling a population health management maturity index using a Delphi method.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Frontrunning, Free-Riding and Over-Aspiring: A Case Study Exploring How Configurations of Involvement, Social Comparison and Organizational Goal Attainment Affect Perceived Network Goal Attainment.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Integrated maternity care: A concept analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Interorganisational collaboration to improve accessibility of diagnostic evaluations for children with a developmental disability.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Governing Integrated Health and Social Care: An Analysis of Experiences in Three European Countries.International journal of integrated careArticle
- The Time is Now, but Mind the Gaps: Communities - Governance - Implementation.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterorganizational networks in healthcare do not always attain their goals. Existing models outline the factors that could explain poor network performance: governance; structure; and the alignment of professional, organizational and network levels. However, these models are very generic and assume a functional approach. We investigate available empirical knowledge on how network structure and governance relate to each other and to network performance in a multilevel context, to get deeper insight, supported with empirics, of why networks (fail to) achieve their goals.
methodA systematic literature review based on a search of Web of Science, Business Source Complete and PubMed was executed in May 2021 and repeated in January 2022. Full papers were included if they were written in English and reported empirical data in a healthcare interorganizational setting. Included papers were coded for the topics of governance, structure, performance and multilevel networks. Papers from the scientific fields of management, administration and healthcare were compared. Document citation and bibliographic coupling networks were visualized using Vosviewer, and network measures were calculated with UCINET.
resultsOverall, 184 papers were included in the review, most of which were from healthcare journals. Research in healthcare journals is primarily interested in the quality of care, while research in management and administration journals tend to focus on efficiency and financial aspects. Cross-citation is limited across different fields. Networks with a brokered form of governance are the most prevalent. Network performance is mostly measured at the community level. Only a few studies employed a multilevel perspective, and interaction effects were not usually measured between levels.
conclusionsResearch on healthcare networks is fragmented across different scientific fields. The current review revealed a range of positive, negative and mixed effects and points to the need for more empirical research to identify the underlying reasons for these outcomes. Hardly any empirical research is available on the effects of different network structures and governance modes on healthcare network performance at different levels. We find a need for more empirical research to study healthcare networks at multiple levels while acknowledging hybrid governance models that may apply across different levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.