Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35850619›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2022

Comparison of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality videos as substitute for in-hospital teaching during coronavirus lockdown: a survey with graduate medical students in Germany.

Albert J Omlor, Leonie S Schwärzel, Moritz Bewarder, Markus Casper, Ellen Damm, Guy Danziger, Felix Mahfoud, Katharina Rentz, Urban Sester, Robert Bals and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Albert J OmlorDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Leonie S SchwärzelDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Moritz BewarderDepartment of Internal Medicine I - Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Markus CasperDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Ellen DammDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Guy DanzigerDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Felix MahfoudDepartment of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Katharina RentzDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Urban SesterDepartment of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Robert BalsDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Philipp M LepperDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a consequence of the continued Covid-19 lockdown in Germany, in-hospital teaching for medical students was impossible. While lectures and other theoretical training were relatively easily converted into online sessions using platforms such as Moodle, Zoom and Microsoft Teams, this was not the case for practical skills and clinical interventions, such as bronchoscopy or colonoscopy. This study describes a workaround that was implemented at the Saarland University Hospital utilizing virtual reality equipment to convey the impressions of shadowing clinical procedures to the students without physical presence. To achieve this, 3D 180° videos of key clinical interventions of various internal medicine specialities were recorded, cut, and censored. The videos were uploaded to the e-learning YouTube channel of our institution and shared with the students via the private share function. The students could choose whether to use a VR-viewer to watch the videos immersively or to watch them without a viewer on a screen non-immersively. At the end of the course after 1 week, the students completed a questionnaire anonymously focusing on learning-success regarding the presented topics, a self-assessment, and an evaluation of the course. A total of 27 students watched the videos with a VR-Viewer and 74 watched non-immersively. Although the VR-viewer group self-assessed their expertise higher, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the learning-success test score. However, students in the VR-viewer group rated the learning atmosphere, comprehensibility, and overall recommendation of the course significantly higher. They also agreed significantly more to the statement, that they gained a better conception of the presented procedures, and that virtual reality might be an appropriate tool for online teaching. Video-assisted teaching facilitates learning and might be a valuable add-on to conventional teaching.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalVirtual RealityCommunicable Disease ControlGermanyHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCovid-19Google Cardboardmedical educationVirtual realityVR 180

Identifiers

PMID35850619
PMCPMC9302008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.