ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2022
Can You Hear Us Now? Equity in Global Advocacy for Palliative Care.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Branching-scenario games in acute end-of-life care education: cultural adaptation and health equity from a public health implementation perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Experiences of intensive care unit nurses in end-of-life care at Ho Teaching Hospital, Ghana: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- "…I feel like I am just staying here waiting for death": A qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with advanced illness in refugee settlements in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- The legal needs of people receiving palliative care in Uganda: A multi-method assessment to advance universal health coverage.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Mapping Palliative Care Availability and Accessibility: A First Step to Eradicating Access Deserts in the Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of palliative care · 2024Article
- Financing for pandemic preparedness and response measures: a systematic scoping review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Article
- Measuring palliative care integration in Malawi through service provision, access, and training indicators: the Waterloo Coalition Initiative.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Comprehensive scoping review of palliative care development in Africa: recent advances and persistent gaps.Frontiers in health services · 2024Review
- Barriers and facilitators to palliative care for patients with non-curable cancer in Colombia: perspectives of allied health and social care professionals.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Kenyan palliative care providers' and leaders' perceptions of palliative care research needs and support to facilitate rigorous research.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Palliative Justice Post-COP27.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023Review
- Palliative care for chronic respiratory diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-based advocacy underpins the sustainable delivery of quality, publicly guaranteed, and universally available palliative care. More than 60 million people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have no or extremely limited access to either palliative care services or essential palliative care medicines (e.g., opioids) on the World Health Organization Model List. Indeed, only 12% of the global palliative care need is currently being met. Palliative care advocacy works to bring this global public health inequity to light. Despite their expertise, palliative care practitioners in LMICs are rarely invited to health policymaking tables - even in their own countries - and are underrepresented in the academic literature produced largely in the high-income world. In this paper, palliative care experts from Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, Sudan, Uganda, and Zambia affiliated with the International Association for Hospice & Palliative Care Advocacy Focal Point Program articulate the urgent need for evidence-based advocacy, focusing on significant barriers such as urban/rural divides, cancer-centeredness, service delivery gaps, opioid formulary limitations, public policy, and education deficits. Their advocacy is situated in the context of an emerging global health narrative that stipulates palliative care provision as an ethical obligation of all health systems. To support advocacy efforts, palliative care evaluation and indicator data should assess the extent to which LMIC practitioners lead and participate in global and regional advocacy. This goal entails investment in transnational advocacy initiatives, research investments in palliative care access and cost-effective models in LMICs, and capacity building for a global community of practice to capture the attention of policymakers at all levels of health system governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.