Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849935›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2022

A rapid assessment of take-home naloxone provision during COVID-19 in Europe.

Rebecca McDonald, Desiree Eide, Katri Abel-Ollo, Lee Barnsdale, Ben Carter, Thomas Clausen, Ed Day, Francina Fonseca, Elin Holmén, Kirsten Horsburgh and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Rebecca McDonaldNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: Rebecca.mcdonald@medisin.uio.no.
Desiree EideNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Katri Abel-OlloDrug Abuse and Infectious Diseases Prevention Centre, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
Lee BarnsdalePublic Health Scotland, UK.
Ben CarterDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Thomas ClausenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Ed DayInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK.
Francina FonsecaAddiction Research Group, Neuroscience Research Program, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Elin HolménCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Needle Exchange, Stockholm Centre for Dependency Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kirsten HorsburghScottish Drugs Forum, Glasgow, UK.
Mike KelleherSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Martin KåbergCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin LadenhaufCaritas Kontaktladen und Streetwork im Drogenbereich, Graz, Austria.
Andrew McAuleyPublic Health Scotland, UK; School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Nicola MetrebianNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Joanne NealeNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen ParkinNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Kevin RatcliffeChange Grow Live, Birmingham, UK.
Chris RintoulCranstoun, Esher, UK.
Josie SmithSubstance Misuse Programme, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Viktorija StifanoviciuteDrug, Tobacco and Alcohol Control Department, Lithuania.
Marta TorrensAddiction Research Group, Neuroscience Research Program, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Henrik ThiesenHealth Team for the Homeless, Center for Marginalized Adults and Families, Copenhagen City Social Services, Denmark.
John StrangNational Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London · GBHospital Del Mar · ESCentre for Mental Health · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBKarolinska Institutet · SENational Institute for Health Development · EEPublic Health Scotland · GBPublic Health Wales · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBStockholm Resilience Centre · SEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. In the following weeks, most European countries implemented national lockdowns to mitigate viral spread. Services for people who use drugs had to quickly revise their operating procedures to rearrange service provision while adhering to lockdown requirements. Given the scarcity of literature published on overdose prevention during COVID-19 in Europe, we aimed to examine how these changes to service provision affected take-home naloxone (THN) programmes and naloxone availability across Europe.

methodsBetween November 2020 and January 2021, we conducted a rapid assessment with country experts from European countries that provide THN. We sent country experts a template to report monthly THN distribution data (January 1, 2019-October 31, 2020) and a structured 6-item survey for completion.

resultsResponses were received from 14 of the 15 European countries with THN provision of which 11 participated in the rapid assessment: Austria, Denmark, England, Estonia, Lithuania, Northern Ireland, Norway, Scotland, Spain (Catalonia only), Sweden, and Wales. All reported reduced organisational capacity during COVID-19, and some put into place a range of novel approaches to manage the restrictions on face-to-face service provision. In six countries, the introduction of programme innovation occurred alongside the publication of government guidelines recommending increased THN provision during COVID-19. Eight of the eleven participating countries managed to maintain 2019-level monthly THN distribution rates or even increase provision during the pandemic.

conclusionThrough programme innovation supported by public guidelines, many European THN programmes managed to ensure stable or even increased THN provision during the pandemic, despite social distancing and stay-at-home orders affecting client mobility.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersCommunicable Disease ControlHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsCoronavirusHarm reductionHeroinOpiateOpioidOverdose

Identifiers

PMID35849935
PMCPMC9247228
OpenAlexW4283743483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.