ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2022
Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal gene transfer in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other Saccharomycotina yeasts: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Population Ecology of Glacier Bacteria from the View of Gene Flow inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Weak pervasive incompatibilities and compensatory adaptation drive hybrid genome evolution in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics provides comprehensive insights into the evolutionary relationships among cultivated buckwheat species.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Artificial chromosome reorganization reveals high plasticity of the budding and fission yeast genomes.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Chromosome number variation and phylogenetic divergence of East Asian Cirsium sect. Onotrophe subsect. Nipponocirsium (Compositae), with a new species from Taiwan.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- Article
- Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Mechanisms of Intrinsic Postzygotic Isolation: From Traditional Genic and Chromosomal Views to Genomic and Epigenetic Perspectives.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023Review
- Meiotic Recognition of Evolutionarily Diverged Homologs: Chromosomal Hybrid Sterility Revisited.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Incompatibility and Interchangeability in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most challenging problem in speciation research is disentangling the relative strength and order in which different reproductive barriers evolve. Here, we review recent developments in the study of reproductive isolation in yeasts. With over a thousand genome-sequenced isolates readily available for testing the viability, sterility, and fitness of both intraspecies and interspecies hybrid crosses, Saccharomyces yeasts are an ideal model to study such fundamental questions. Our survey demonstrates that, while chromosomal-level mutations are widespread at the intraspecific level, anti-recombination-driven chromosome missegregation is the primary reproductive barrier between species. Finally, despite their strength, all of these postzygotic barriers can be resolved through the asexual life history of hybrids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.