Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849849›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Identifying and addressing pill aversion in adults without physiological-related dysphagia: A narrative review.

Alice P McCloskey, Peter E Penson, Yincent Tse, Majadah A Abdelhafiz, Shah N Ahmed, Emma J Lim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Reaping the rewards of a simplified dosing regimen.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alice P McCloskeySchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-1624
Peter E PensonSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-1489
Yincent TseGreat North Children's Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3175-1475
Majadah A AbdelhafizSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Shah N AhmedSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Emma J LimGreat North Children's Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Liverpool John Moores University · GBGreat North Children's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid oral dosage forms (SODFs) (often called pills by patients) are the default formulation to treat medical ailments. Beneficial therapeutic outcomes rely on patients taking them as directed. Up to 40% of the population experience difficulties swallowing SODFs, resulting in reduced adherence and impaired therapeutic efficacy. Often associated with children, this also presents in adults with dysphagia, and without any organic dysphagia (non-physiological-related or functional dysphagia). This review aims to identify and appraise current interventions used to screen for and overcome pill aversion in adults with functional dysphagia. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted. Articles reporting pill aversion in adults aged ≥18 years with no underlying cause, history of, or existing dysphagia were included. Study quality was determined using the STROBE tool for observational studies. A narrative synthesis of the findings was prepared. We identified 18 relevant cohort studies, which demonstrate that pill aversion is a global problem. Perceived ease of and/or SODF swallowability appears to be influenced by female gender, younger age, co-morbidities (e.g., depression), and physical SODF properties. Patients often modify their medicines rather than raise this issue with their healthcare team. Screening for pill aversion is haphazard but controlled postural adjustments, coating SODFs and behavioural interventions appear to be successful solutions. SODF swallowing difficulties are a barrier to effective medication use. Healthcare professionals must recognise that pill aversion is a problem requiring identification through effective screening and resolution by training interventions, appropriate formulation selection or specialist referral.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesDeglutitionFemaleHumansadherencedrug informationmedical educationmedication safetypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID35849849
PMCPMC9805106
OpenAlexW4285802154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.