Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849812›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia progress2022

Optimal Timing of Intravenous Acetaminophen Administration for Postoperative Analgesia.

Maho Shinoda, Akiko Nishimura, Erika Sugiyama, Hitoshi Sato, Takehiko Iijima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia progress, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maho ShinodaDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Akiko NishimuraDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Erika SugiyamaDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Showa University School of Pharmacy, Japan.
Hitoshi SatoDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Showa University School of Pharmacy, Japan.
Takehiko IijimaDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcetaminophen (APAP) is widely used as an analgesic for postoperative pain relief. However, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) properties of intravenous APAP administration remain unclear. We developed a PK-PD model in adult volunteers.

methodsAPAP (1 g) was intravenously administered to 15 healthy volunteers. The pain equivalent current (PEC) was then measured using the pulse current, corresponding to the quantitative value of pain perception. The PK model was developed using a 2-compartment model, and the PD model was developed using a linear model and an effect compartment model.

resultsAPAP plasma concentration peaked just administration, whereas PEC significantly increased at 90 minutes and lasted through the experimental period (300 minutes). APAP plasma concentrations and PEC were processed for use in the PK-PD model. The developed PK-PD model delineates the analgesic effect profile, which peaked at 188 minutes and lasted until 327 minutes.

conclusionWe developed the PK/PD model for APAP administered intravenously. The analgesic effect can be expected ∼90 minutes after administration and to last >5 hours. It is suggested that APAP be administered ∼90 minutes prior to the onset of anticipated postoperative pain.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAdultAnalgesicsHumansPostoperative PainAcetaminophenAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAcetaminophenIntravenousPharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID35849812
PMCPMC9301534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.