Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849794›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Virtual Care Prior to and During COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey of Rural and Urban Adults.

Kathy L Rush, Cherisse L Seaton, Kendra Corman, Nicole Hawe, Eric Ping Hung Li, Sarah J Dow-Fleisner, Mohammad Khalad Hasan, Nelly D Oelke, Leanne M Currie, Barbara Pesut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathy L RushSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-7187
Cherisse L SeatonSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-9894
Kendra CormanSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-8823
Nicole HaweSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-0664
Eric Ping Hung LiFaculty of Management, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-6769
Sarah J Dow-FleisnerSchool of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-5856
Mohammad Khalad HasanDepartment of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-5461
Nelly D OelkeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1666-5360
Leanne M CurrieSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-2809
Barbara PesutSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-7190
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce person-to-person contact, the COVID-19 pandemic has driven a massive shift to virtual care. Defined as the use of technology (synchronous or asynchronous) to support communication between health care providers and patients, rural-urban differences in virtual care are relatively unexplored.

objectiveThe 2-fold purpose of this study was to examine rural and urban virtual care access, use, and satisfaction during the pandemic and to identify any unmet needs.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional online survey exploring virtual care among rural and urban adults in summer 2021 using a combination of fixed and open-ended response options. Quantitative data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis.

resultsOverall, 501 (373, 74.4% female; age range 19-86 years; 237, 47.3% rural-living) Western Canadians completed the survey. Virtual care use was high among both rural (171/237, 72.2%) and urban (188/264, 71.2%) participants, with over one-half (279/501, 55.7%) reporting having only started to use virtual care since the pandemic. The self-reported need for mental health programs and services increased during the pandemic, compared with prior for both rural and urban participants. Among virtual care users, interest in its continuation was high. Our analysis also shows that internet quality (all P<.05) and eHealth literacy (all P<.001) were positively associated with participants' perceptions of virtual care usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction, with no rural-urban differences. Rural participants were less likely to have used video in communicating with doctors or health care providers, compared with urban participants (P<.001). When describing unmet needs, participants described a (1) lack of access to care, (2) limited health promotion and prevention options, and (3) lack of mental health service options.

conclusionsThe increased demand for and use of virtual care may reflect increased availability and a lack of alternatives due to limited in-person services during the COVID-19 pandemic, so a balance between virtual care and in-person care is important to consider postpandemic. Further, ensuring availability of high-speed internet and education to support patients will be important for providing accessible and effective virtual care, especially for rural residents.

Indexed as

COVID-19digital literacyruralunmet needsurbanvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID35849794
PMCPMC9400845
OpenAlexW4285504704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.