Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849793›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

DOCKSTRING: Easy Molecular Docking Yields Better Benchmarks for Ligand Design.

Miguel García-Ortegón, Gregor N C Simm, Austin J Tripp, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Andreas Bender, Sergio Bacallado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. EasyDock 1.3: An Automated Pipeline for Molecular Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Computational Study of Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miguel García-OrtegónStatistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Rd., Cambridge CB3 0WB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-4706
Gregor N C SimmDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6815-352X
Austin J TrippDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-7740
José Miguel Hernández-LobatoDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7610-949X
Andreas BenderYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd., Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-7546
Sergio BacalladoStatistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Rd., Cambridge CB3 0WB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7193-6450

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P01710X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of machine learning for drug discovery is witnessing an explosion of novel methods. These methods are often benchmarked on simple physicochemical properties such as solubility or general druglikeness, which can be readily computed. However, these properties are poor representatives of objective functions in drug design, mainly because they do not depend on the candidate compound's interaction with the target. By contrast, molecular docking is a widely applied method in drug discovery to estimate binding affinities. However, docking studies require a significant amount of domain knowledge to set up correctly, which hampers adoption. Here, we present dockstring, a bundle for meaningful and robust comparison of ML models using docking scores. dockstring consists of three components: (1) an open-source Python package for straightforward computation of docking scores, (2) an extensive dataset of docking scores and poses of more than 260,000 molecules for 58 medically relevant targets, and (3) a set of pharmaceutically relevant benchmark tasks such as virtual screening or

Indexed as

ProteinsDrug DesignLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35849793
PMCPMC9364321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.