Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849790›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Melanoma Micrometastases From an International Multicenter Study: Implications for the Management of American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIA Disease.

Marc D Moncrieff, Serigne N Lo, Richard A Scolyer, Martin J Heaton, Jenny P Nobes, Andrew P Snelling, Michael J Carr, Carolyn Nessim, Ryckie Wade, A Howard Peach and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Marc D MoncrieffNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4492-235X
Serigne N LoMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-5544
Richard A ScolyerMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-0013
Martin J HeatonNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Jenny P NobesNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Andrew P SnellingNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Michael J CarrH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-6233-4004
Carolyn NessimThe Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ryckie WadeLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-6547
A Howard PeachLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1349-3935
Rumi KisyovaNorth Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jennifer MasonNorth Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ewan D WilsonNorth Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Grant NolanSt Helens and Knowsley NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-3218
Rowan Pritchard JonesSt Helens and Knowsley NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Iva JohanssonSahlgrenska Centre for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-4637
Roger Olofsson BaggeSahlgrenska Centre for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-0355
Lucie J WrightUnited Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Nakul G PatelUnited Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Vernon K SondakH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-484X
John F ThompsonMelanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-2496
Jonathan S ZagerH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6886-4468
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBMoffitt Cancer Center · USNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBThe University of Sydney · AULeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESt Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndications for offering adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with early-stage melanomas with low disease burden sentinel node (SN) micrometastases, namely, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC; eighth edition) stage IIIA disease, are presently controversial. The current study sought to identify high-risk SN-positive AJCC stage IIIA patients who are more likely to derive benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy.

methodsPatients were recruited from an intercontinental (Australia/Europe/North America) consortium of nine high-volume cancer centers. All were adult patients with pathologic stage pT1b/pT2a primary cutaneous melanomas who underwent SN biopsy between 2005 and 2020. Patient data, primary tumor and SN characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

resultsThree thousand six hundred seven patients were included. The median follow-up was 34 months. Pairwise disease comparison demonstrated no significant survival difference between N1a and N2a subgroups. Survival analysis identified a SN tumor deposit maximum dimension of 0.3 mm as the optimal cut point for stratifying survival. Five-year disease-specific survival rates were 80.3% and 94.1% for patients with SN metastatic tumor deposits ≥ 0.3 mm and < 0.3 mm, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.26 [1.11 to 1.44];

conclusionPatients with AJCC IIIA melanoma with SN tumor deposits ≥ 0.3 mm in maximum dimension are at higher risk of disease progression and may benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy or enrollment into a clinical trial. Patients with SN deposits < 0.3 mm in maximum dimension can be managed similar to their SN-negative, AJCC IB counterparts, thereby avoiding regular radiological surveillance and more intensive follow-up.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultExtranodal ExtensionHumansNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35849790
OpenAlexW4285803599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.