Observational studyAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2022
Performance of Early Capillary Refill Time Measurement on Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: An Observational, Prospective Multicentric Study.
Observational study in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESICM guidelines on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring 2025.Intensive care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Sublingual microcirculatory assessment on admission independently predicts the outcome of old intensive care patients suffering from shock.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study.Intensive care medicine · 2023Trial
- Hypoperfusion-Shock Continuum in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Review
- Article
- Device-measured capillary refill time identifies critically ill cases in the emergency department.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Thermal intervention improves pulse oximetry accuracy in critically ill patients with low perfusion: a quasi-experimental study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Lactate in cardiogenic shock: pathophysiology, prognostic value, and clinical interpretation.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Cutaneous microcirculatory disturbances are reversible in the early post-resuscitation period after asphyxial cardiac arrest.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
- Timing of inotropic support is associated with mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure-associated cardiogenic shock.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- DiCARTJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- Macrovascular Hemodynamics and Peripheral Perfusion in Cardiogenic Shock: Exploring Current Targets and Future Directions.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiogenic shock: diagnosis, phenotyping and management.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- A CLINICAL PREDICTION MODEL FOR SHORT-TERM PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION-RELATED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between mean hemodynamic variables during the first 24 h and outcomes in cardiogenic shock: identification of clinically relevant thresholds.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- The association of capillary refill time and return of spontaneous circulation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.