Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849713›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2022

The protocol for assessing olfactory working memory capacity in mice.

Li-Xin Jiang, Geng-Di Huang, Hua-Li Wang, Chen Zhang, Xin Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li-Xin JiangPeking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Geng-Di HuangPeking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Hua-Li WangPeking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-6493
Chen ZhangCapital Medical University, Youanmenwai, Beijing, China.
Xin YuPeking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0830-4725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorking memory capacity (WMC) is the ability to maintain information over a few seconds. Although it has been extensively studied in healthy subjects and neuropsychiatric patients, few tasks have been developed to measure such changes in rodents. Many procedures have been used to measure WM in rodents, including the radial arm maze, the WM version of the Morris swimming task, and various delayed matching and nonmatching-to-sample tasks. It should be noted, however, that the memory components assessed in these procedures do not include memory capacity.

methodsWe developed an olfactory working memory capacity (OWMC) paradigm to assess the WMC of 3-month-old 5×FAD mice, a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. The task is divided into five phases: context adaptation, digging training, rule learning for nonmatching to a single sample odor (NMSS), rule learning for nonmatching to multiple sample odors (NMMS), and capacity testing.

resultsIn the NMSS rule-learning phase, there was no difference between wild-type (WT) mice and 5×FAD mice in the performance correct rate, correct option rate, and correct rejection rate. The WT mice and 5×FAD mice showed similar memory capacity in the NMMS rule-learning phase. After capacity test, we found that the WMC was significantly diminished in 5×FAD mice. As the memory load increased, 5×FAD mice also made significantly more errors than WT mice.

conclusionThe OWMC task, based on a nonmatch-to-sample rule, is a sensitive and robust behavioral assay that we validated as a reliable method for measuring WMC and exploring different components of memory in mice.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMemory, Short-TermAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideHumansMaze LearningMiceMice, TransgenicSmellFlavin-Adenine Dinucleotide5×FAD miceodorworking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID35849713
PMCPMC9392537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.