Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849637›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2022

In vitro evolution predicts emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutations with high affinity for ACE2 and cross-species binding.

Neil Bate, Christos G Savva, Peter C E Moody, Edward A Brown, Sian E Evans, Jonathan K Ball, John W R Schwabe, Julian E Sale, Nicholas P J Brindle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neil BateDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicester United Kingdom.
Christos G SavvaLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Peter C E MoodyLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Edward A BrownLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Sian E EvansDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicester United Kingdom.
Jonathan K BallSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham United Kingdom.
John W R SchwabeLeicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Julian E SaleDivision of Protein & Nucleic Acid Chemistry, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nicholas P J BrindleDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicester United Kingdom.
University of Leicester · GBMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/65/31707British Heart Foundation PG/19/27/34305Medical Research Council MC_PC_17136Medical Research Council MC_PC_19043Medical Research Council MC_PC_20027Medical Research Council MC_U105178808Medical Research Council MR/S009434/1Medical Research Council U105178808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants are creating major challenges in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Being able to predict mutations that could arise in SARS-CoV-2 leading to increased transmissibility or immune evasion would be extremely valuable in development of broad-acting therapeutics and vaccines, and prioritising viral monitoring and containment. Here we use in vitro evolution to seek mutations in SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) that would substantially increase binding to ACE2. We find a double mutation, S477N and Q498H, that increases affinity of RBD for ACE2 by 6.5-fold. This affinity gain is largely driven by the Q498H mutation. We determine the structure of the mutant-RBD:ACE2 complex by cryo-electron microscopy to reveal the mechanism for increased affinity. Addition of Q498H to SARS-CoV-2 RBD variants is found to boost binding affinity of the variants for human ACE2 and confer a new ability to bind rat ACE2 with high affinity. Surprisingly however, in the presence of the common N501Y mutation, Q498H inhibits binding, due to a clash between H498 and Y501 side chains. To achieve an intermolecular bonding network, affinity gain and cross-species binding similar to Q498H alone, RBD variants with the N501Y mutation must acquire instead the related Q498R mutation. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 RBD can access large affinity gains and cross-species binding via two alternative mutational routes involving Q498, with route selection determined by whether a variant already has the N501Y mutation. These mutations are now appearing in emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants where they have the potential to influence human-to-human and cross-species transmission.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansMutationPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AProtein BindingRatsReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Peptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35849637
PMCPMC9333441
OpenAlexW4285726542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.