ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2023
Mortality among twin individuals exposed to loss of a co-twin.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sibling Death in Childhood and Early Adulthood and Risk of Early-Onset Cardiovascular Disease.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Comment on 'Mortality among twin individuals exposed to loss of a co-twin'.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the death of a child, sibling or spouse has been associated with elevated risk of mortality, less is known about the survival of twin siblings exposed to a co-twin loss.
methodsIn a Swedish population-based sibling-matched cohort, we compared the mortality of 5548 twin individuals who lost their co-twin between 1932 and 2011 with that of 27 740 age-matched and sex-matched twin individuals without such a loss and 6772 full siblings of these exposed twin individuals. Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
resultsWe found increased risk of all-cause mortality among twin individuals exposed to a co-twin loss compared with matched unexposed twin individuals (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18-1.43) and their full siblings (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.96-1.27) after adjusting for multiple covariates. The all-cause mortality risk was greater for loss of a co-twin due to unnatural deaths (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17-2.03) than natural deaths (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.40). For cause-specific mortality, co-twin loss was associated with a higher risk of unnatural deaths both among twin individuals who lost their co-twin due to unnatural deaths (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.27-3.10) and those whose loss was due to natural deaths (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.07-2.06). The risk elevations were generally stronger for loss of a monozygotic co-twin than loss of a dizygotic co-twin.
conclusionLoss of a co-twin, especially a monozygotic co-twin, was associated with increased mortality, particularly of unnatural causes, among the surviving twin individuals. The excess mortality is likely attributable to both shared disease susceptibility within the twin pair and the adverse health sequelae of bereavement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.