Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849287›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Educational Review: Neoadjuvant Approaches to Melanoma.

Cimarron E Sharon, Giorgos C Karakousis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cimarron E SharonDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Maloney 4, Philadelphia, PA, USA. cimarron.sharon@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Giorgos C KarakousisDivision of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Maloney 4, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of novel systemic therapies, the treatment of patients with melanoma has changed drastically over the past few years, especially with regard to neoadjuvant treatments. Standard of care for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma traditionally consisted of surgery, with possible adjuvant treatment. However, there have been promising improvements in patient outcomes with neoadjuvant treatment compared to upfront surgery, specifically with targeted and immune therapies.

methodsA review of clinical trials in the neoadjuvant treatment of stage III/IV melanoma was performed.

resultsMultiple phase I-II clinical trials have investigated the utility of interferon, targeted therapies (i.e., BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors) in the treatment of resectable clinical stage III/IV melanoma. Large strides have been made with regards to optimal treatment strategy and dosing, to maximize clinical and pathologic response rates while minimizing toxicities. Additionally, complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapies translates to a disease-free survival benefit. Current and future directions include individualizing surgical and adjuvant therapy based on patient response to neoadjuvant treatments.

conclusionsThe current evidence, represented by small phase I-II trials, demonstrates advantages to neoadjuvant treatment with targeted or immune therapy for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma. Future research is needed to determine the advantages of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant treatment, and to further refine treatment strategies based on patient response.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant Therapy

Identifiers

PMID35849287
OpenAlexW4285728850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.