ArticleFolia microbiologica2022
Increased production of chitinase by a Paenibacillus illinoisensis isolated from Brazilian coastal soil when immobilized in alginate beads.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic and functional profiles of two Antarctic chitin-degrading Arthrobacter strains.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The accumulation of chitin waste from the seafood industry is a serious environmental problem. However, this residue can be degraded by chitinases and its subproducts, such as chitosan, economically exploited. In this study, a chitinase producer bacteria, identified as Paenibacillus illinoisensis, was isolated from the Brazilian coastal city of Terra de Areia - Rio Grande Do Sul (RS) and was immobilized within alginate beads to evaluate its chitinase production. The alginate beads containing cells presented an average size of 4 mm, 99% of immobilization efficiency and increased the enzymatic activity in 40.71% compared to the free cells. The biomass during enzymatic production increased 62.01% and the total cells leaked from the alginate beads corresponded to 6.46% after 96 h. Immobilized cells were reused in a sequential batch system and remained stable for production for up to four 96-h cycles, decreasing only 21.04% of the initial activity at the end of the fourth cycle. Therefore, the methodology used for cell immobilization resulted in adequate beads to maintain cell viability during the enzymatic production, increasing enzymatic activity, showing low cell leakage from the support and appropriate recyclable capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.