Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849205›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2022

Cognitive enrichment in a social setting: assessing the use of a novel food maze in sanctuary-housed chimpanzees.

Maria Padrell, Federica Amici, Maria Pau Córdoba, Miquel Llorente

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Promoting Good Nonhuman Primate Welfare outside Regular Working Hours.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria PadrellDepartament de Psicologia, Facultat d'Educació i Psicologia, Universitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènech 9, 17004, Girona, Spain. mariapadrell@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-7711
Federica AmiciDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-1067
Maria Pau CórdobaResearch Department, Fundació Mona, 17457, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-0227
Miquel LlorenteDepartament de Psicologia, Facultat d'Educació i Psicologia, Universitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènech 9, 17004, Girona, Spain. miguel.llorente@udg.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003-1983
Universitat de Girona · ESLeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya 2017 SGR-1040"la Caixa" Foundation LCF/PR/PR17/11120020Universitat Rovira i Virgili 2019PFR-URV91
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging devices are effective enrichment tools for non-human primates, as they provide both cognitive and manipulative stimulation that may enhance these animals' welfare. We assessed the behavioral effects of a novel tool-based enrichment on 14 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) housed at Fundació Mona (Girona, Spain). The device consisted of a vertical maze filled with food rewards, which chimpanzees could extract by using tools. We conducted behavioral observations in two conditions over an approximately 2.5-month period: when the food maze was loaded (12 enrichment days), and when it was empty (12 baseline days). Data were collected using 2-min scan sampling and untimed-event focal sampling during two daily sessions of 80 min each. We expected that the chimpanzees' interest in the enrichment would decrease over time, but that its use would be linked to an increase in the occurrence of species-typical behaviors, a reduction in negative indicators of welfare, and changes in social behaviors. We found that participation widely varied among subjects, being higher in females and decreasing through time. Furthermore, participation was linked to an increase in tool use and a decrease in inactivity, but also to an increase in aggression-related behaviors. In contrast, participation had no effect on the occurrence of abnormal behaviors, social proximity or affiliation-related behaviors. Finally, we detected an increase in self-directed behaviors only when subjects actively interacted with the device. We conclude that, in future studies, these types of devices should be evaluated for longer periods of time and more attention should be paid to individuals' preferences and abilities.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalPan troglodytesAnimalsAnimal WelfareCognitionFemaleHumansSocial BehaviorBehaviorChimpanzeesCognitive enrichmentTool useWelfare

Identifiers

PMID35849205
PMCPMC9463267
OpenAlexW4285726354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.