ArticleCurrent protocols2022
Protein Structural Modeling for Electron Microscopy Maps Using VESPER and MAINMAST.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Secondary Structure and DNA/RNA Detection for Cryo-EM and Cryo-ET Using Emap2sec and Emap2secMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Cryo2StructData: A Large Labeled Cryo-EM Density Map Dataset for AI-based Modeling of Protein Structures.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Cryo2StructData: A Large Labeled Cryo-EM Density Map Dataset for AI-based Modeling of Protein Structures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Deep learning for reconstructing protein structures from cryo-EM density maps: Recent advances and future directions.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023Review
- Protein Structural Modeling for Electron Microscopy Maps Using VESPER and MAINMAST.Current protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An increasing number of protein structures are determined by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and stored in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). To interpret determined cryo-EM maps, several methods have been developed that model the tertiary structure of biomolecules, particularly proteins. Here we show how to use two such methods, VESPER and MAINMAST, which were developed in our group. VESPER is a method mainly for two purposes: fitting protein structure models into an EM map and aligning two EM maps locally or globally to capture their similarity. VESPER represents each EM map as a set of vectors pointing toward denser points. By considering matching the directions of vectors, in general, VESPER aligns maps better than conventional methods that only consider local densities of maps. MAINMAST is a de novo protein modeling tool designed for EM maps with resolution of 3-5 Å or better. MAINMAST builds a protein main chain directly from a density map by tracing dense points in an EM map and connecting them using a tree-graph structure. This article describes how to use these two tools using three illustrative modeling examples. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Protein structure model fitting using VESPER Alternate Protocol: Atomic model fitting using VESPER web server Basic Protocol 2: Protein de novo modeling using MAINMAST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.