Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849035›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2023

Depatuxizumab mafodotin in EGFR-amplified newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A phase III randomized clinical trial.

Andrew B Lassman, Stephanie L Pugh, Tony J C Wang, Kenneth Aldape, Hui K Gan, Matthias Preusser, Michael A Vogelbaum, Erik P Sulman, Minhee Won, Peixin Zhang and 22 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 110 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Dual Immune Check Point Blockade inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Next-generation therapeutics for glioblastoma: Challenges and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  15. NAR cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.

Andrew B LassmanDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7386-9928
Stephanie L PughRTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tony J C WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology (in Neurological Surgery), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Kenneth AldapeCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-7550
Hui K GanCancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthias PreusserDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2315
Michael A VogelbaumDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Erik P SulmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University, Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Minhee WonRTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Peixin ZhangRTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Golnaz MoazamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Marian S MacsaiNorthShore University HealthSystem, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Mark R GilbertNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Earle E BainAbbvie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Vincent BlotAbbvie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter J AnsellAbbvie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Suvajit SamantaAbbvie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Madan G KunduAbbvie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6616-5762
Terri S ArmstrongNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jeffrey S WefelDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Clemens SeidelUniversity Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Filip Y de VosUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sigmund HsuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrés F CardonaFoundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research-FICMAC/Clinical and Translational Oncology Group, Brain Tumor Section, Bogotá, Colombia.
Giuseppe LombardiDepartment of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-2132
Dmitry BentsionSverdlovsk Regional Oncology Center, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Richard A PetersonMetro Minnesota NCORP, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Craig GedyeCalvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia.
Véronique BourgDepartment of Neurology, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France.
Antje WickHeidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Walter J CurranWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Minesh P MehtaMiami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.
AbbVie (United States) · USAmerican College of Radiology · USNational Cancer Institute · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USCalvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AUEmory University · USFoundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research · COHeidelberg University · DEIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITMedical University of Vienna · ATMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USNYU Langone Health · USObservatoire de la Côte d’Azur · FRThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUlyanovsk Regional Oncology Center · RU

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam, GREG YOTHERS · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
Genomic Biomarkers of CancerZIABC011850 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ALDAPE, KENNETH · 2019 to 2025
$5.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 50% of newly diagnosed glioblastomas (GBMs) harbor epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification (EGFR-amp). Preclinical and early-phase clinical data suggested efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (overexpressed wild-type and EGFRvIII-mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin in EGFR-amp GBMs.

methodsIn this phase III trial, adults with centrally confirmed, EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy, temozolomide, and depatux-m/placebo. Corneal epitheliopathy was treated with a combination of protocol-specified prophylactic and supportive measures. There was 85% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) ≤0.75 for overall survival (OS) at a 2.5% 1-sided significance level (ie traditional two-sided p ≤ 0.05) by log-rank testing.

resultsThere were 639 randomized patients (median age 60, range 22-84; 62% men). Prespecified interim analysis found no improvement in OS for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.26, 1-sided p = 0.63). Progression-free survival was longer for depatux-m than placebo (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.01, p = 0.029), particularly among those with EGFRvIII-mutant (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, 1-sided p = 0.002) or MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97; 1-sided p = 0.012) tumors but without an OS improvement. Corneal epitheliopathy occurred in 94% of depatux-m-treated patients (61% grade 3-4), causing 12% to discontinue.

conclusionsInterim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for depatux-m in treating EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM. No new important safety risks were identified.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTemozolomideAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddepatuxizumab mafodotinEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsTemozolomideantibody drug conjugatedepatuxizumab mafodotinEGFRglioblastomaphase III

Identifiers

PMID35849035
PMCPMC9925712
OpenAlexW4285733154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.