Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35849025›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2022

Upgrading Organic Compounds through the Coupling of Electrooxidation with Hydrogen Evolution.

Guangbo Chen, Xiaodong Li, Xinliang Feng

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COChemSusChem · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Electrochemical N-N Oxidatively Coupled Dehydrogenation of 3,5-Diamino-1Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guangbo ChenCenter for Advancing Electronics Dresden (Cfaed), Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-3642
Xiaodong LiCenter for Advancing Electronics Dresden (Cfaed), Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Xinliang FengCenter for Advancing Electronics Dresden (Cfaed), Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-2703
Technische Universität Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics · DE

Funding

DFG 417590517H2020 European Research Council 881603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrocatalytic splitting of water is recognized to be the most sustainable and clean technology for the production of hydrogen (H

Indexed as

CouplingElectrocatalysisHybrid Water ElectrolyzerHydrogen EvolutionUpgrading Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35849025
PMCPMC9826310
OpenAlexW4285728049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.