Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848982›Full record

ReviewJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2022

Herbal anthelmintic agents: a narrative review.

Manjusa Adak, Pradeep Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Combined ethanolic extracts ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring the anthelmintic potential of some fabaceous plants: a comprehensive review.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Anthelmintic Potential of DiscardedJournal of pharmacopuncture · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anthelmintic Activity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manjusa AdakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Natural Products, Central University of Punjab, Ghudda, Bathinda, Punjab 151401, India.
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Natural Products, Central University of Punjab, Ghudda, Bathinda, Punjab 151401, India.
Central University of Punjab · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helminths or Parasitic worms of humans may cause chronic and sometimes deadly diseases, considered as neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) that infect around two billion people worldwide. Plants have been used as anthelmintics from ancient times. This review is a compilation of plants as source of anthelmintic drug. All information presented in this review article regarding the anthelmintic activities of plants from 2005 and has been acquired by approaching various electronic databases, including Scopus, Google scholar, Web of science and PubMed. Literature was surveyed for anthelmintic activity of plants which showed that secondary metabolites of plants like terpenes, glycosides, saponins, flavonoids, tannins and alkaloids were having anthelmintic activity. Since this review is a compilation of anthelmintic activity of plants from the year 2005, it will definitely be a fruitful study for researchers working in this field.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsSaponinsFlavonoidsHumansPlant ExtractsAnthelminticsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsSaponinsanthelminticsbiological productshelminthiasishelminths

Identifiers

PMID35848982
PMCPMC9924796
OpenAlexW4285792723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.