Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848819›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Mathematical relationships between spinal motoneuron properties.

Arnault H Caillet, Andrew T M Phillips, Dario Farina, Luca Modenese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnault H CailletDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6146-1829
Andrew T M PhillipsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6618-0145
Dario Farina *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-2697
Luca Modenese *Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-5359
Imperial College London · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the behaviour of spinal alpha-motoneurons (MNs) in mammals partly relies on our knowledge of the relationships between MN membrane properties, such as MN size, resistance, rheobase, capacitance, time constant, axonal conduction velocity, and afterhyperpolarization duration. We reprocessed the data from 40 experimental studies in adult cat, rat, and mouse MN preparations to empirically derive a set of quantitative mathematical relationships between these MN electrophysiological and anatomical properties. This validated mathematical framework, which supports past findings that the MN membrane properties are all related to each other and clarifies the nature of their associations, is besides consistent with the Henneman's size principle and Rall's cable theory. The derived mathematical relationships provide a convenient tool for neuroscientists and experimenters to complete experimental datasets, explore the relationships between pairs of MN properties never concurrently observed in previous experiments, or investigate inter-mammalian-species variations in MN membrane properties. Using this mathematical framework, modellers can build profiles of inter-consistent MN-specific properties to scale pools of MN models, with consequences on the accuracy and the interpretability of the simulations.

Indexed as

Motor NeuronsSpinal CordAnimalsMammalsMiceRatsHenneman's size principlemathematical relationshipsmotoneuronmotor neuronmotor neuron sizemotor unitneurosciencenonephysics of living systems

Identifiers

PMID35848819
PMCPMC9612914
OpenAlexW3214976548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.