ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2022
Identification and therapeutic evaluation of ALK rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Testing and Immunohistochemical Staining in DetectingCancers · 2026Article
- The growing field of liquid biopsy and its Snowball effect on reshaping cancer management.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- A narrative review of methods for the identification ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to present a comprehensive assessment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements evaluated by DNA/RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. We investigated ALK gene fusions in 14,894 patients with NSCLC using Ventana IHC and NGS, including 12,533 cases detected via DNA-based NGS and 2,361 cases using RNA-based NGS. The overall percentage agreement (OPA), positive percentage agreement (PPA), and negative percentage agreement (NPA) were calculated when comparing the results between NGS and IHC. The therapeutic responses to ALK-TKIs were also evaluated. In total, 3.50% (439/12,533) of specimens were NGS ALK-positive (NGS-p) in the DNA-based NGS cohort and 3.63% (455/12,533) were IHC ALK-positive (IHC-p). The OPA of NGS was 99.60%, whereas its PPA and NPA were 92.75 and 99.86%, respectively. In the adenocarcinoma (ADC) subcohort, the PPA was 95.69%. In the RNA-based NGS cohort, 2.20% (52/2,361) of specimens were NGS-p and 2.63% (62/2,361) were IHC-p. The OPA of NGS was 99.49%; its PPA and NPA were 82.26 and 99.96%, respectively. Thirteen patients with discordant results received ALK-TKI treatment. In the seven NGS-p/IHC-negative (IHC-n) patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 85.4% (6/7) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. In the six NGS-negative/IHC-p patients, the ORR was 66.7% (4/6) and the DCR was 100%. In summary, a high concordance of ALK gene fusion detected via NGS and IHC was observed in this study. DNA-based NGS had a higher OPA, PPA, and PPA in the ADC subcohort, whereas RNA-based NGS had a higher NPA. Overall, the results suggest that the combination of NGS and IHC can improve the accuracy of ALK fusion detection; hence, a result determination algorithm for clinical detection of ALK gene fusion was also proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.