Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848707›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2022

Ontogenetic changes in the tooth morphology of bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas).

Kyle Goodman, Yuri Niella, Taylor Bliss-Henaghan, Robert Harcourt, Amy F Smoothey, Victor M Peddemors

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bull Shark (Biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle GoodmanSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0638-9323
Yuri NiellaSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-6091
Taylor Bliss-HenaghanSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert HarcourtSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Amy F SmootheyNSW Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.
Victor M PeddemorsNSW Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUSydney Institute of Marine Science · AU

Funding

Faculty of Science and Engineering Macquarie UniversityInternational Macquarie University Research Training Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth are an integral component of feeding ecology, with a clear link between tooth morphology and diet, as without suitable dentition prey cannot be captured nor broken down for consumption. Bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, undergo an ontogenetic niche shift from freshwater to marine habitats, which raises the question: does tooth morphology change with ontogeny? Tooth shape, surface area and thickness were measured using both morphometrics and elliptic Fourier analysis to determine if morphology varied with position in the jaw and if there was an ontogenetic change concordant with this niche shift. Significant ontogenetic differences in tooth morphology as a function of position in the jaw and shark total length were found, with upper and lower jaws of bull sharks presenting two different tooth morphologies. Tooth shape and thickness fell into two groupings, anterior and posterior, in both the upper and lower jaws. Tooth surface area, however, indicated three groupings, mesial, intermediate and distal, in both the upper and lower jaws. While tooth morphology changed significantly with size, showing an inflection at sharks of 135 cm total length, each morphological aspect retained the same tooth groupings throughout. These ontogenetic differences in tooth morphologies reflect tooth strength, prey handling and heterodonty.

Indexed as

SharksToothAnimalsDietEcosystemJawdentitionelasmobranchsforaging ecologyjawsontogenetic shifts

Identifiers

PMID35848707
OpenAlexW4285730263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.