ArticlePerfusion2023
Left ventricular venting during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; the effects on cardiac performance in a porcine model of critical post-cardiotomy failure.
Article in Perfusion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transaortic Catheter Venting for Left Ventricular Unloading in Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support: A Porcine Cardiogenic Shock Model.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Left ventricle unloading during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: review with updated evidence.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLeft ventricular distension is a major concern with postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supporting a critical heart failure after cardiac surgery. This porcine study evaluates the effects of left ventricular venting on cardiac function during ECMO-supported circulation and after weaning from ECMO.
methodsTwenty anaesthetised open-chest pigs were put on cardiopulmonary bypass with aortic cross-clamping and suboptimal cardioplegic arrest for 40 min. After declamping and defibrillation, the animals were supported by VA-ECMO for 180 min either with or without additional left ventricular venting. Continuous haemodynamic evaluations were performed at baseline and at cardiac arrest, during VA-ECMO and for 120 min after weaning from circulatory support. Left ventricular perfusion and function were evaluated with microspheres, pressure-volume loops and epicardial echocardiography at baseline and after 1 and 2 h with unsupported circulation.
resultsIn vented animals both mean aortic and left ventricular peak systolic pressure increased at the end of the ECMO-supported period compared to those not vented and remained increased also after weaning. Both at 60 min and 120 min after weaning from circulatory support, left ventricular stroke work and pressure-volume area were increased in vented compared to not vented animals. At 120 min left ventricular stroke volume was increased in vented compared to not vented animals, myocardial perfusion did not differ. The left ventricular mechanical efficiency, defined as the ratio between pressure volume area and myocardial perfusion, was increased (53.2 ± 5 vs 36.2 ± 2.1 J/mL/g,
conclusionThis experimental study demonstrate that left ventricular venting during post-cardiotomy veno-arterial ECMO for 3 h attenuates deterioration of left ventricular function and haemodynamics early after weaning from circulatory support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.