Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848428›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group2022

3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos, Mithat Gonen, Vlasios Sotirchos, Elena Kaye, Elena N Petre, Stephen B Solomon, Joseph P Erinjeri, Etay Ziv, Assen Kirov, Constantinos T Sofocleous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Estimation of tumor coverage after RF ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma using single 2D image slices.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microwave Ablation of Refractory Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Liver.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nikiforos Vasiniotis KamarinosDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-1270
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vlasios SotirchosDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7278-1369
Elena KayeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Elena N PetreDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stephen B SolomonDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph P ErinjeriDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Etay ZivDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Assen KirovDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Constantinos T SofocleousDepartment of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the feasibility and prognostic value of 3D measuring of the ablation margins using a dedicated image registration software.

methodsThis retrospective study included 104 colorectal liver metastases in 68 consecutive patients that underwent microwave ablation between 08/2012 and 08/2019. The minimal ablation margin (MM) was measured in 2D using anatomic landmarks on contrast enhanced CT(CECT) 4-8 weeks post-ablation, and in 3D using an image registration software and immediate post-ablation CECT. Local tumor progression (LTP) was assessed by imaging up to 24 months after ablation. A blinded interventional radiologist provided feedback on the possibility of additional ablation after examining the 3D-margin measurements.

resultsThe 3D-margin assessment was completed in 79/104 (76%) tumors without the need for target manipulation. In 25/104 (24%) tumors, manipulation was required due to image misregistration. LTP was observed in 40/104 (38.5%) tumors: 92.5% vs 7.5% for those with margin <5mm vs ≥5mm, respectively (

conclusionImage registration software can measure ablation margins and detect MM under 5 mm intraoperatively, with significantly higher sensitivity than the 2D technique using landmarks on the post-ablation CECT. The identification of a margin under 5 mm is strongly associated with LTP.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationColorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsHumansMargins of ExcisionRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcomeablation margin assessmentcolorectal cancer liver metastasesThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID35848428
PMCPMC9442248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.