Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848413›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2023

Mental representations of speech and musical pitch contours reveal a diversity of profiles in autism spectrum disorder.

Li Wang, Jia Hoong Ong, Emmanuel Ponsot, Qingqi Hou, Cunmei Jiang, Fang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Linguistic and Musical Syntax Processing in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li WangUniversity of Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-2408
Jia Hoong OngUniversity of Reading, UK.
Emmanuel PonsotGhent University, Belgium.
Qingqi HouNanjing Normal University of Special Education, China.
Cunmei JiangShanghai Normal University, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0264-5924
Fang LiuUniversity of Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7776-0222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractAs a key auditory attribute of sounds, pitch is ubiquitous in our everyday listening experience involving language, music and environmental sounds. Given its critical role in auditory processing related to communication, numerous studies have investigated pitch processing in autism spectrum disorder. However, the findings have been mixed, reporting either enhanced, typical or impaired performance among autistic individuals. By investigating top-down comparisons of internal mental representations of pitch contours in speech and music, this study shows for the first time that, while autistic individuals exhibit diverse profiles of pitch processing compared to non-autistic individuals, their mental representations of pitch contours are typical across domains. These findings suggest that pitch-processing mechanisms are shared across domains in autism spectrum disorder and provide theoretical implications for using music to improve speech for those autistic individuals who have language problems.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderMusicSpeech PerceptionHumansPitch PerceptionSpeechautism spectrum disordermental representationmusicpitch processingreverse correlationspeech

Identifiers

PMID35848413
PMCPMC10074762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.