Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848379›Full record

SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2023

Prevalence of allergic sensitization with vernal keratoconjunctivitis: A systematic review with meta-analyses.

Marie Louise Roed Rasmussen, Maria D'Souza, Divan Gabriel Topal, Josefine Gradman, Dorte Ancher Larsen, Bettina Behrmann Lehrmann, Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer, Line Kessel, Yousif Subhi

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: The burden of being allergic.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT chatbot responses for patient and parent questions on vernal keratoconjunctivitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marie Louise Roed RasmussenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-8697
Maria D'SouzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Divan Gabriel TopalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Josefine GradmanHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Dorte Ancher LarsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bettina Behrmann LehrmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Henrik Fomsgaard KjaerDepartment of Dermatology, Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Line KesselDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-1510
Yousif SubhiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6620-5365
Glostrup Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of allergic sensitization in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and to provide an overview of published studies on this topic. We systematically searched 11 literature databases on 24 May 2021, for studies with cross-sectional data on the prevalence of positive allergy tests in patients with VKC. Our main outcome of interest was the prevalence of allergic sensitization and the allergens involved. Prevalence meta-analyses were made to provide summary estimates. We identified 33 eligible studies for qualitative review with 2122 patients with VKC. Studies were predominantly based on patients seen in ophthalmology clinics. Overall, studies reported that the most prevalent positive allergen tests were the inhaled allergens house dust mites and pollen. Twenty-nine studies were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Here, we calculated the prevalence of allergen-positive patients to 57.7% (95% confidence interval: 52.5%-62.8%). Subgroup analyses of pooled estimates on sensitization based on specific testing methods found prevalence estimates of 51.4% for conjunctival provocation test, 68.7% for total tear IgE, 58.9% for specific tear IgE, and 58.2% for skin prick test. The prevalence of allergic sensitization in patients with VKC is 57.7%, and mostly towards inhaled allergens. The most frequent positive allergens are house dust mites and pollen. Identifying possible clinically relevant allergens provide information that may aid in managing VKC, such as environmental allergy-avoidance or allergy-specific treatment.

Indexed as

Conjunctivitis, AllergicAllergensCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin EPrevalenceAllergensImmunoglobulin EIgEmeta-analysisskin prick testsystematic reviewvernal keratoconjunctivitis

Identifiers

PMID35848379
PMCPMC10084059
OpenAlexW4285730626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.