Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35848335›Full record

SynthesisJournal of rehabilitation medicine2022

Skeletal Muscle Changes in the First Three Months of Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review.

David Beckwée, Lotte Cuypers, Nina Lefeber, Emma De Keersmaecker, Ellen Scheys, Wout Van Hees, Stany Perkisas, Sylvie De Raedt, Eric Kerckhofs, Ivan Bautmans and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06603701 (Follow up of Strength and Body Composition With Impedancemeter Device During the First 10 Days After Acute Stroke.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06603701 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Follow up of Strength and Body Composition With Impedancemeter Device During the First 10 Days After Acute Stroke.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2024 to 2024Enrolled6ConditionsStroke, AcuteArmsBioimpedancemetry, Dynamometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current Trends in Balance Rehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review of Experimental Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David BeckwéeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gerontology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in ageing (FRIA) research department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. David.Beckwee@vub.be.
Lotte CuypersDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Nina LefeberDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Emma De KeersmaeckerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ellen ScheysDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Wout Van HeesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Stany PerkisasZiekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA), University Center for Geriatrics, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sylvie De RaedtCenter for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Eric KerckhofsDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ivan BautmansDepartment of Gerontology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in ageing (FRIA) research department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva SwinnenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research unit Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Frailty in ageing (FRIA) research department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Brussels Human Robotic Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation is important in the first months after a stroke for recovery of functional ability, but it is also challenging, since distinct recovery trajectories are seen. Therefore, studying the early changes in muscle characteristics over time (e.g. muscle strength, muscle mass and muscle volume), which are known to be associated with functional abilities, may deepen our understanding of underlying recovery mechanisms of stroke survivors.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to describe the longitudinal changes in skeletal muscles, including muscle strength, muscle mass and muscle volume, during the first 3 months post-stroke.

methodsElectronic searches were conducted in Medline, Scopus and CENTRAL. Longitudinal cohort studies or controlled interventional trials that report data about patients in the first 3 months after stroke were identified. Skeletal muscle characteristics should be measured at least twice within 3 months post-stroke by objective, quantitative assessment methods (e.g. dynamometry, ultrasound, computed tomography). Effect sizes were calculated as Hedges' g using standardized mean differences.

resultsA total of 38 studies (1,097 subjects) were found eligible. Results revealed an mean increase on the paretic side for upper and lower limb muscle strength (small to moderate effect sizes), whereas muscle thickness decreased (moderate to large effect sizes). Similar, but smaller, effects were found on the non-paretic side. There were insufficient data available to draw conclusions about lean muscle mass and muscle cross-sectional area. No studies aimed at investigating distinct trajectories of the muscle changes.

conclusionMuscle strength and thickness changes during the first 3 months after stroke in both the paretic and non-paretic side. Future studies should aim to understand "how" the stroke-induced muscle strength changes are achieved. Exploring existing data from longitudinal studies, by using cluster analyses, such as pattern recognition, could add to the current knowledge-base.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMuscle, SkeletalParesis

Identifiers

PMID35848335
PMCPMC9575591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.