Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2022
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative pain relief and functional outcomes following robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the risk of postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot assisted compared to conventional knee arthroplasty: metanalysis and systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted vs. navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the latest controlled studies based on perioperative, functional, and radiographic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Continuous outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty trials are statistically fragile.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Does Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Outcomes of Adult Osteoarthritis Patients-A Systematic Review and Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Computerized Versus Traditional Approaches for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes when compared to conventional TKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Pooled it
- Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Trial
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: accuracy, clinical outcomes, complications, learning curve and cost-effectiveness: a critical clinical review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Asia-Pacific expert consensus on robotic-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Review
- Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Evidence on PROMs, Functional Outcomes, Neuromotor Recovery, and Complications-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty at 12-month follow-up: a prospective, multicenter, concomitant comparison to conventional total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of serum systemic inflammatory biomarkers in bone-milling robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Early outcomes and the learning curve of two domestically produced surgical robot systems with different operational philosophies for total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- [Robotics in knee arthroplasty : Current status and developments].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- AI-assisted preoperative planning combined with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty vs. conventional surgery: a retrospective controlled study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRobot-assisted surgery has been promoted worldwide in recent years. The development of a domestic orthopaedic robot and its clinical application are therefore of great significance. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of domestic robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM-TKA).
methodsA total of 77 patients who underwent primary single-sided TKA from June to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled; resulting in the inclusion of 72 patients. The patients were randomly divided into the RA-TKA group (37 cases, with TKA being assisted by the Yuanhua Orthopaedic Robotic System) and the CM-TKA group (35 cases, with TKA being performed using conventional tools). Knee function was evaluated by the knee range of motion (ROM), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Postoperative radiographic results were evaluated by full-length weight-bearing X-rays of the lower limb and anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the knee were obtained preoperatively and at 90 days postoperative. The operative duration, blood loss, postoperative knee function, radiographic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared by Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test. Serum levels of inflammatory markers before the operation and 1, 3, and 30 days after the operation were recorded and compared between the two groups.
resultsThe operation was significantly longer in the RA-TKA group than in the CM-TKA group (154.3 vs 115.2 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in blood loss (933 vs 863 ml, p = 0.519) between the two groups. The knee ROM, KSS, and WOMAC were significantly improved in both groups 90 days after the operation compared with before the operation (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups. In the radiographic findings at 90 days postoperatively we found the frequency of lateral tibial component (LTC) angle outliers was significantly lower in the RA-TKA group (3.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly lower in the RA-TKA group than in the CM-TKA group on day 1 after surgery (9.9 vs 12.7, p = 0.024).
conclusionsRA-TKA requires more time than CM-TKA, which may be related to the learning curve and intraoperative registration. The short-term postoperative knee functional outcomes had no differences between the two groups, and RA-TKA improved the accuracy of tibial component alignment. Further follow-up studies are required to investigate the long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.