Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35847911›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

The Prognostic and Clinical Value of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Changjun Wang, Yan Lin, Hanjiang Zhu, Yidong Zhou, Feng Mao, Xin Huang, Qiang Sun, Chenggang Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Combination of proteome and transcriptome analysis to predict survival and immunotherapy response in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Changjun WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hanjiang ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, 90 Medical Center Way, Surge 110, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Yidong ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng MaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang SunDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenggang LiState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNNankai University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prognostic and clinical value of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in patients with breast cancer (BCa) remains unclear. We conducted the current meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the association of CD68+ and CD163+ TAM density with the prognosis and clinicopathologic features of BCa patients. Methods: Searches of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were performed up to January 31, 2022. The meta-analysis was conducted using hazard risks (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for survival data including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and BCa specific survival. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were also conducted to identify the robustness of the pooled estimates. Results: Our literature search identified relevant articles involving a total of 8,496 patients from 32 included studies. Our analysis indicates that a high CD68+ TAM density in the tumor stoma was significantly linked with poor OS (HR 2.46, 95% CI, 1.83-3.31, Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that a high CD68+ and CD163+ TAM density is associated with poor OS and shorter DFS in BCa patients. Further clinical studies and Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022304853, identifier CRD42022304853.

Indexed as

breast cancermeta-analysissurvivalsystematic reviewtumor-associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID35847911
PMCPMC9280493
OpenAlexW4283757974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.