ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
A Novel Algorithm for Detecting Microsatellite Instability Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome Concordance Between Borderline Tumors and Endometrioid Carcinoma: An Integrative Genomic Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Performance assessment of computational tools to detect microsatellite instability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Clinical predominance of whole-exome sequencing to evaluate microsatellite instability status.Cancer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the condition of genetic hypermutability caused by spontaneous acquisition or loss of nucleotides during the DNA replication. MSI has been discovered to be a useful immunotherapy biomarker clinically. The main DNA-based method for MSI detection is polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and fragment length analysis, which are costly and laborious. Thus, we developed a novel method to detect MSI based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Methods: We chose six markers of MSI. After alignment and reads counting, a histogram was plotted showing the counts of different lengths for each marker. We then designed an algorithm to discover peaks in the generated histograms so that the peak numbers discovered in NGS data resembled that in PCR-based method. Results: We selected nine samples as the training dataset, 101 samples for validation, and 68 samples as the test dataset from Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Inner Mongolia, China. The NGS-based method achieved 100% accuracy for the validation dataset and 98.53% accuracy for the test dataset, in which only one false positive was detected. Conclusions: Accurate MSI judgments were achieved using NGS data, which could provide comparable MSI detection with the gold standard, PCR-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.